Submitted by s3igell (not verified) on Sun, 2006-12-03 22:02.
Have you looked to whether the PTAssembler v3.5 ( beta ) changes your workflow in any significant manner ??
The script files are more successfully exposed, so that may allow for alternative workflow.
btw: Please provide an example of the filenames you use for successful 8->16 bit substitution for the final processing. Are you editing the batch script ?? Or naming 16-bit .TIF files with .JPG extension ??
PTAssembler v3.5 betas
Have you looked to whether the PTAssembler v3.5 ( beta ) changes your workflow in any significant manner ??
The script files are more successfully exposed, so that may allow for alternative workflow.
btw: Please provide an example of the filenames you use for successful 8->16 bit substitution for the final processing. Are you editing the batch script ?? Or naming 16-bit .TIF files with .JPG extension ??